[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17035180#comment-17035180
]
Sergey Kosarev commented on IGNITE-8414:
----------------------------------------
[~EdShangGG], please see [dev
list|http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-Deprecation-of-obsolete-rebalancing-functionality-td45824.html]
Does it really implemented?
> In-memory cache should use BLAT as their Affinity Topology
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-8414
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8414
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Eduard Shangareev
> Assignee: Eduard Shangareev
> Priority: Major
> Labels: IEP-4, Phase-2
>
> Now in-memory caches use all active server nodes as affinity topology and it
> changes with each node join and exit. What differs from persistent caches
> behavior which uses BLAT (BaseLine Affinity Topology) as their affinity
> topology.
> It causes problems:
> - we lose (in general) co-location between different caches;
> - we can't avoid PME when a non-BLAT node joins cluster;
> - implementation should consider 2 different approaches to affinity
> calculation.
> To handle these problems we should make in-memory and persistent cache work
> similar.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
