[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17040970#comment-17040970
 ] 

Vyacheslav Koptilin commented on IGNITE-12705:
----------------------------------------------

Yes, I thought about the approach you mentioned. IMHO, this way of fixing has 
the following drawbacks:
 - it breaks the existing contract. I mean that the SYNC cache will always take 
precedence even though it has a rebalance order greater than the ASYNC cache. 
And I admit the fact that someone can use this functionality.
 - it seems we cannot guarantee that 'ignite-sys-cache' will be rebalanced in 
the first place. For now, it guaranteed by the fact that this cache has 
rebalancing order equals to '-2'. By default, the rebalance order is 0.

> Schedule rebalancing of SYNC caches with high priority
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-12705
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12705
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 2.8
>            Reporter: Vyacheslav Koptilin
>            Assignee: Vyacheslav Koptilin
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.9
>
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In current implementation order in which rebalancing is triggered seems to be 
> arbitrary, regardless of the configured rebalanceMode. In this case 
> Ignition.start() method is forced to wait not only for rebalancing of SYNC 
> caches, but also the ones that are scheduled for rebalancing before it.
> This behavior should be fixed by making SYNC caches rebalance first, before 
> going to any other caches.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to