[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17067941#comment-17067941
]
Kartik Somani commented on IGNITE-12702:
----------------------------------------
Also, IgniteCache interface has 3 implementations. I'll have to write log in
each of these implementations, but won't be able to ensure that future
implementations will also do this.
> Print warning when a cache value contains @AffinityKeyMapped annotation
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-12702
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12702
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: cache
> Reporter: Denis Mekhanikov
> Assignee: Kartik Somani
> Priority: Major
> Labels: newbie
>
> Consider the following code snippet:
> {code:java}
> public class WrongAffinityExample {
> public static void main(String[] args) {
> Ignite ignite = Ignition.start("config/ignite.xml");
> IgniteCache<EmployeeKey, EmployeeValue> cache =
> ignite.getOrCreateCache("employees");
> EmployeeKey key = new EmployeeKey(1);
> EmployeeValue value = new EmployeeValue(1, "Denis");
> cache.put(key, value);
> }
> public static class EmployeeKey {
> private int id;
> public EmployeeKey(int id) {
> this.id = id;
> }
> }
> public static class EmployeeValue {
> @AffinityKeyMapped
> int departmentId;
> String name;
> public EmployeeValue(int departmentId, String name) {
> this.departmentId = departmentId;
> this.name = name;
> }
> }
> }
> {code}
> Note, that {{EmployeeValue}} contains an {{@AffinityKeyMapped}} annotation,
> which doesn't have any effect, since it's specified in a value, and not in a
> key.
> Such mistake is simple to make and pretty hard to track down.
> This configuration should trigger a warning message printed in log to let
> the user know that this affinity key configuration is not applied.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
