[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14557525#comment-14557525
 ] 

Thiago Souza commented on IGNITE-881:
-------------------------------------

I would like to start contributing to Ignite through this issue. 

But I've got a question, the current implementation in 
DataStructuresCommandHandler takes "initial" and "delta" as arguments while the 
commands in GridCacheCommandHandler takes "val" and "val2", how should I adapt 
this?

> Refactor ATOMIC_INCREMENT and ATOMIC_DECREMENT REST commands to use entry 
> processor
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-881
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-881
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: newbie
>            Reporter: Yakov Zhdanov
>
> Currently, these commands alter the state of CacheAtomicLong, but they will 
> be more flexible if they atomically change cache key-value mapping.
> Consider the following:
> # Move handling logic to GridCacheCommandHandler
> # Whenever command is received handling node should call 
> {{org.apache.ignite.IgniteCache#invoke(K, 
> org.apache.ignite.cache.CacheEntryProcessor<K,V,T>, java.lang.Object...)}} to 
> properly change the value (depending on the argument) and return result
> # If value is not a Number, error should be returned to the caller.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to