afs commented on issue #2732: URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/2732#issuecomment-2368830765
"RRX SAX" is faster than "ev" and "sr" (using the JDK XML). It's the wired in RDF/XML parser RDF/XML by default. But I wouldn't have got to a SAX implementation without doing the easier EV! Converting to EV to SR was mechanical ... but wasn't really faster. (I've kept EV and SR alive - it's quite good discipline - > Only the changing error messages are preventing you from integrating the new code into Jena? That and checking. > Is there anything I could do? I'm just coming to the end of implementing RDF 1.2/SPARQL 1.2 as it is today in the RDFstar WG (things will change more - that's the nature of Working Groups). I could provide a buildable IRI3986 extension using `JenaSubsystemLifecycle`. Let's take it to dev@ about migration of IRI code. > Just two tiny fixes Interesting. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
