afs commented on issue #2852: URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/2852#issuecomment-2488633389
With the WG starting up, I don't think Jena should add ad-hoc extension features yet because the WG may choose to go in a different direction. AF features may not go though unchanged. The scope of SHACL-C isn't clear - will it cover all areas of SHACL? - and it may need some rethinking of SHACL-C for qualified constraints, SPARQL constraints, and whatever is coming/covered in rules/UI declaration - anything which is more than one property. When the WG has a probably direction, an experimental form of SHACL-C could be done to get real-world feedback I'm not convinced the current grammar can be simply extend to all SHACL features; -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
