afs commented on issue #3561: URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/3561#issuecomment-3496985841
> We're attempting to use [Parsson](https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/ee4j.parsson) as a replacement - I don't have any test results yet, but I wouldn't count too much on them anyway: and earlier: > This is our current approach as well, but I'd say it would be preferable if these kinds of workaround would not be needed in the first place. Are you saying that Parsson does work for you? Is the test coverage on a significant number of JSON-LD files? > it would be preferable if these kinds of workaround would not be needed in the first place. Yes, but. We do not know your environment. You have said you use Jena via another library - which one? - so the dependency setup is not simple. What is important for Jena is to fix the problem for everyone in one go. Information from users is helpful for that. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
