afs commented on issue #3643: URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/3643#issuecomment-3660618141
> On the baseline artifacts: my assumption is that `jena-benchmarks-shadedJena560` would be created as part of this task, while the older ones would be dropped. Great. > I’m also open to the idea of not having jena-benchmarks built as part of the main reactor (same top-level POM), but I’m not fully sure what the preferred Jena approach would be. But how exactly would that look like? A second POM would work. But this part is a longer term item for us to think through. > My perspective on keeping `jena-benchmarks` as an asset in the Jena repository: It certainly is an asset. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
