fpotier commented on issue #4025: URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/4025#issuecomment-4891219233
> [@afs](https://github.com/afs) Yes, the bug fix seems straightforward, but there won't be any more releases in the 1.x.x line, it will have to wait for 2.x.x. > > [@fpotier](https://github.com/fpotier) If the validation policy is set to `UriValidationPolicy.SchemeOnly`, then it should relax this restriction. It won't be dropped, but an "incorrectly" encoded IRI would be produced. See: > > https://github.com/filip26/titanium-json-ld/blob/30cecf015ab43bc7182a63fc54139e1134839345/src/main/java/com/apicatalog/jsonld/tordf/JsonLdToQuads.java#L146 Thanks for your answers. Sorry my previous comment probably wasn't clear but I switched to `UriValidationPolicy.SchemeOnly` and tested my use-case which seem to work just fine. I just wondered if there was any known pitfalls in jena when the graph contains non valid IRIs. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
