https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54459
--- Comment #1 from Sebb <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #0) > - the code does not check that the format actually works. Not strictly true: it does check that the format parses the timestamp. However, the created DateFormat instance is lenient, and may match only part of the timestamp string. For example, MM/dd/yy HH:mm:ss happily matches 2013/01/19 20:55:07 but parses it as 1 Sep 2186 19:55:07 GMT. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
