https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54717
--- Comment #6 from Sebb <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Sebb from comment #5) > (In reply to Philippe Mouawad from comment #3) > > It does not yet do what you propose but it should improve the blocking time. > > The sampleStore needs to be synchronised for both the clone() and clear() > methods otherwise a sample can be added between the clone() and the clear(). > Or possibly the store can be updated during the clone(). In either case, > samples can be lost if the code is not synchronised. > > That's partly why the existing code is synchronised - to make sure samples > are not lost. Sorry, I see now that the code is still synchronised - the idea of the clone() is presumably to decouple the sending from the extracting of the samples. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
