https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55827
--- Comment #3 from Bob Atkey <[email protected]> --- > Thanks for report, I was wondering why your tool does not also report line > 456: > return new PropertyIteratorImpl(propMap.values()); Actually, our tool doesn't report the instance on line 456 because it doesn't look into the implementation of PropertyIteratorImpl while analysing the AbstractTestElement class. Therefore, it doesn't realise that everything that is passed in will have .iterator() called on it. This is certainly something that we will look at adding to ThreadSafe in the future. Thanks! > Did you report all findings of your tool or only some examples ? I only reported two examples of findings that I thought looked interesting. If I get more time soon I will report the rest of the interesting looking reports that ThreadSafe gives. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
