https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56510
--- Comment #3 from Tom M. <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Philippe Mouawad from comment #2) > > Regarding patch, I think integrating it as-is would be a bit disturbing as > the 2 "properties" are in fact Headers, so allowing users to put them in JMS > Properties would be misleading. > The same would apply to JMSCorrelationID which can be set in the JMS Properties table although it is a header too. Moving this one to a dedicated text field could possibly break backward compatibility, so this has to be taken into account? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
