https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59174
--- Comment #3 from Philippe Mouawad <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Felix Schumacher from comment #2) > Created attachment 34691 [details] > Test case demonstrating the behaviour with 3.1 Thanks > > Test against the tomcat manager app which runs on localhost. But as this is > a test case to demonstrate the usage of a host header, it is thought of > running on example.com. > > What I think is the expected behaviour: > Authorization manager should be asked for credentials of "example.com" > It is asking for "localhost" > > Java client is working with 3.1 (it is asking for localhost, though) > HttpClient 4.x is not working (neither asking for localhost nor example.com) > > (This whole business of specifying a host header by hand to simulate virtual > hosts seems wrong. We should be looking at giving a dns resolver, that > resolves "example.com" to localhost (don't know how to change the port)) So is this a real problem or is it due to the host hack ? Did you try with current build on jenkins ? Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
