https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62861
--- Comment #5 from Philippe Mouawad <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Abhishek Rao from comment #4) > (In reply to Philippe Mouawad from comment #3) > > (In reply to Abhishek Rao from comment #2) > > > Hi Philippe, > > > > > > The first one is okay. > > > > > > The configuration you mentioned works, but how do I achieve pooling and > > > indefinite reuse rather than reusing for an arbitrary time period? For > > > example: I have scripts acting as clients using pooled connection > > > architectures to talk to web-services internally where this feature will > > > be > > > really useful in simulating. > > > > What if you set: > > httpclient4.idletimeout=0 > > httpclient4.validate_after_inactivity=1700 > > httpclient4.time_to_live=Very high value > > > > > > > Can this be a UI modifiable in future and > > > parametric? > > > Also, how do I achieve hybrid simulations with one thread group using > > > httpclient.reset_state_on_thread_group_iteration=true and one that needs > > > it > > > set to false? > > > > This would be an enhancement request. > > Workaround is to use distributed testing with 1 JVM in first mode and second > > JVM in second mode. > > > I dont think the workaround would apply for my scenario, because there's two > thread groups in the same script and each requires a different setting. > Distributed mode with different settings across JVMs would mean both the > thread groups are affected, when the scenario calls for just one thread > group to have the setting reflected. I think I'll split it into two tests > for now and run them in parallel. I think the aforementioned will make for a > great enhancement, I also found out that HC4 supports > PooledConnectionManager which solves the problem. What about my first note ? Regarding workaround, just do the following: - use for threads field of each Thread Group : ${__P(threads_TG1,)} ${__P(threads_TG2,)} Then run first jmeter-server with: -Jthreads_TG1=X -Jthreads_TG2=0 And second with: -Jthreads_TG1=0 -Jthreads_TG2=Y I think it will work -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
