https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63620
--- Comment #14 from Felix Schumacher <felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> --- (In reply to Vladimir Sitnikov from comment #13) > > Right, but it is in the calculation of the width of lines to break them > > apart, so it would still be helpful to try to pretty print the large json > > structure (if it shortens the lines), don't you think? > > 1) An option to pretty-print based on the content type makes sense. However > it might "defeat" regular expressions because "user-visible" json would be > different from the one that came from the network. > However I do support the idea of pretty-printing by default I didn't think about pretty printing by us, but by the user (at least in this case), but we could think about it. > > 2) Even though we have content type, it is not always right. For instance, > they might sent the data as text/plain, and we have very little clue on how > to pretty-print. right. No idea here, we could try to guess the content, but I am pretty sure this would be a bad idea. > > 3) We might want to implement an option to "forcibly add newlines" for lines > exceeding N characters. A plus would be to put that newlines in-between word > breaks so it won't tear words. That might be a decent workaround. As kind of a fallback pretty printer? That could work (with the addition of soft and hard breaks in the case there are no word boundaries) > > 4) It might be a Java-related issue. For instance, they say > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-4202291 is fixed in Java 6 > So it might be JMeter code is doing something wrong. We might want to > analyze what is causing that slowness. > For instance, what if we limit "the maximum width" of the textview? Would it > influence text wrapping algorithm? Or the fix has not been implemented or re-surfaced? There is mentioned that adding a newline to the text would be a workaround. @Frederic could you try to add a newline at the end of your data? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
