https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64196
Wicky Tam <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW --- Comment #13 from Wicky Tam <[email protected]> --- I downloaded the nightly build Jmeter（LATEST (r1659-30a71a3112e436889d69ab9d2cb5403f4a3ab59c)）and tested it. I find that regex extractor and Response Assertion can find the string in sub-sub-sampler in this version of jmeter. It solve the issue of point 2. what about other issues? (In reply to Felix Schumacher from comment #12) > The fix has been committed. Could you please test the next nightly build? > > commit 1a2f24ab25f2a571f7bcb599b4be692eb47dde92 > AuthorDate: Sun Mar 8 15:26:25 2020 +0100 > > Recurse into sub samplers more deeply when checking assertions > > With this change we recurse up to three levels into sub results of > SampleResults > instead of only one level deep. > > This helps in case of parallel downloads of embedded elements of a web > page, which > get stored as sub-sub-sampleresults. > > Bugzilla Id: 64196 > --- > .../org/apache/jmeter/threads/JMeterThread.java | 38 > +++++++++++++--------- > xdocs/changes.xml | 1 + > 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > commit 30a71a3112e436889d69ab9d2cb5403f4a3ab59c > AuthorDate: Sun Mar 8 16:58:35 2020 +0100 > > Recurse into sampleResults for getSampleList > > With this change we collect the sampleList of a SampleReult by recursing > up to > three levels into sub results of SampleResults instead of only one level > deep. > > This helps in case of parallel downloads of embedded elements of a web > page, which > get stored as sub-sub-sampleresults. Before this change a regex Post > Processor would > not see those sub-sub-sampleresults. > > Bugzilla Id: 64196 > --- > .../jmeter/testelement/AbstractScopedTestElement.java | 19 > ++++++++++++++++++- > xdocs/changes.xml | 1 + > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
