[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041141#comment-13041141
]
Andreas Pieber commented on KARAF-638:
--------------------------------------
how would this look for the log command (for example):
log (== log:display)
log set TRACE (log:set TRACE)
log exception (or rather log display exception?)
....
Right?
Basically this looks nice and remembers me somehow of git (git branch, git
branch -D ...)
Although this sounds nice I'm not sure how many changes will be required to
introduce this change into the current code?
> Use the same naming convention in commands
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KARAF-638
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-638
> Project: Karaf
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: console
> Reporter: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>
> In Karaf commands, we should use the same naming convention.
> For instance, we have commands looking like:
> admin:change-rmi-server-port
> admin:change-rmi-registry-port
> dev:create-dump
> and others looking like:
> roleadd
> roledel
> features:listversions
> To be clear for the users, I propose to adopt the same naming convention for
> all commands, like:
> role-add
> role-del
> features:list-versions
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
