[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13164406#comment-13164406
]
Jamie goodyear commented on KARAF-1086:
---------------------------------------
Enable filtering of resources.
Both pom and readme files can be filtered in place - might make for easier
maintenance then a separate filtered-resources file just for the readme.
$ svn ci
Sending branding/pom.xml
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 1211441.
> Create Kar for Karaf demos
> --------------------------
>
> Key: KARAF-1086
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1086
> Project: Karaf
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: karaf-demo
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0
> Reporter: Jamie goodyear
> Assignee: David Jencks
> Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>
> From IRC discussion:
> {code}
> djencks: right so I think the next thing would be to start working on a kar
> project for the demos [18:15]
> jamieg: I'm going to split my JIRA for the kar demo in two -- one for the
> features-maven plugin and the other for the karaf-maven plugin. They approach
> creating kars differently [18:15]
> djencks: we could have a kar per demo or one that installs all the demos
> yes.... AFAIK the features-maven-plugin doesn't actually work to create kars
> which is why I've been hoping 3.0 could be released sooner rather than later
> [18:16]
> jamieg: very true, but it should according to the docs [18:17]
> djencks: and, everything I've been saying is only about trunk/3.0.... [18:17]
> jamieg: Oh yes, that i assumed :) I wouldn't change the packaging of
> demos on a micro release
> 2.x assemblies will pretty much stay as they are [18:18]
> djencks: I think it would be great to find out if the manual instructions are
> correct and comprehensible enough for someone other than me to set up a
> working kar project to install the demos but if you like I could come up with
> at least a start [18:19]
> jamieg: Please feel free to jump in :)
> djencks: I've been learning the kar functionality from the docs and from
> chatting with you ;)
> and others [18:20]
> djencks: ok do you think it would be better to have each demo individually
> installable or have all the demos in one kar? [18:20]
> jamieg: good question :) [18:21]
> djencks:if we decided "individually" we could have a demo archetype but it
> ends up with almost twice as many projects [18:22]
> jamieg: or if we go for 'all' its simple at least
> djencks: do we gain anything from individual demos?
> djencks: an demo archtype could be useful for custom distro builders
> ...
> djencks: perhaps all for 3.0, then individual for 3.1?
> djencks: gets things done fast for 3.0 then build our better functionality
> for 3.1? [18:22]
> djencks: I'll start with an "all" and see how it goes [18:24]
> jamieg: (just trying to manage feature creep - a lot of people are really
> calling for 3.0.0) [18:24]
> djencks: (in particular me :-) [18:24]
> jamieg: hehe [18:24]
> djencks: ok, good, we have a plan.... have to go now for a bit... thanks!
> {code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
