[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13650569#comment-13650569
]
Achim Nierbeck commented on KARAF-1017:
---------------------------------------
It's already done for trunk.
Just one more thing that crossed my mind. Is it better to have the pax-web repo
in the features.xml or in the org.apache.karaf.features.cfg?
For building custom Karaf Distribution it's probably better to have it in the
features.xml.
> Use the Pax Web features.xml for Pax Web 2.0 and further
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KARAF-1017
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1017
> Project: Karaf
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: karaf-feature, karaf-webcontainer
> Reporter: Achim Nierbeck
> Assignee: Achim Nierbeck
> Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>
> Right now the features for web and http are part of the std. karaf features.
> I propose to use the features of pax web instead when upgrading to pax web
> 2.0 and Jetty 8
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
