[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-4980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15860911#comment-15860911
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on KARAF-4980:
--------------------------------------------------------
Commit a6eb9650cf0649122d0d5d7ac9c7fb5fcc81cf6a in karaf's branch
refs/heads/master from [~maggu2810]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=karaf.git;h=a6eb965 ]
[KARAF-4980] add OSGi capabilities for services
Signed-off-by: Markus Rathgeb <[email protected]>
> OSGi framework capabilities: add all services
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KARAF-4980
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-4980
> Project: Karaf
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: karaf-core
> Affects Versions: 4.1.0
> Reporter: Markus Rathgeb
> Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
> Fix For: 4.1.1
>
>
> The services provided by the Felix and the Equinox framework differs and
> should be provided by the system capabilities.
> I used service:list to find the services that are provided by Felix and the
> ones that are provided by Equinox.
> I would like to propagate this change to the config.properties (I will create
> a PR if you agree):
> {noformat}
> org.osgi.framework.system.capabilities= \
> ${eecap-${java.specification.version}}, \
> ${${karaf.framework}-capabilities}
> felix-capabilities= \
>
> osgi.service;effective:=active;objectClass=org.osgi.service.packageadmin.PackageAdmin,
> \
>
> osgi.service;effective:=active;objectClass=org.osgi.service.resolver.Resolver,
> \
>
> osgi.service;effective:=active;objectClass=org.osgi.service.startlevel.StartLevel
> equinox-capabilities= \
> osgi.service;effective:=active;objectClass=java.lang.ClassLoader, \
>
> osgi.service;effective:=active;objectClass=javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory,
> \
>
> osgi.service;effective:=active;objectClass=javax.xml.parsers.SAXParserFactory,
> \
>
> osgi.service;effective:=active;objectClass=org.eclipse.equinox.log.ExtendedLogReaderService,
> \
>
> osgi.service;effective:=active;objectClass=org.eclipse.equinox.log.ExtendedLogService,
> \
>
> osgi.service;effective:=active;objectClass=org.eclipse.osgi.framework.log.FrameworkLog,
> \
>
> osgi.service;effective:=active;objectClass=org.eclipse.osgi.service.datalocation.Location,
> \
>
> osgi.service;effective:=active;objectClass=org.eclipse.osgi.service.debug.DebugOptions,
> \
>
> osgi.service;effective:=active;objectClass=org.eclipse.osgi.service.debug.DebugOptionsListener,
> \
>
> osgi.service;effective:=active;objectClass=org.eclipse.osgi.service.environment.EnvironmentInfo,
> \
>
> osgi.service;effective:=active;objectClass=org.eclipse.osgi.service.localization.BundleLocalization,
> \
>
> osgi.service;effective:=active;objectClass=org.eclipse.osgi.service.security.TrustEngine,
> \
>
> osgi.service;effective:=active;objectClass=org.eclipse.osgi.service.urlconversion.URLConverter,
> \
>
> osgi.service;effective:=active;objectClass=org.eclipse.osgi.signedcontent.SignedContentFactory,
> \
>
> osgi.service;effective:=active;objectClass=org.osgi.service.condpermadmin.ConditionalPermissionAdmin,
> \
>
> osgi.service;effective:=active;objectClass=org.osgi.service.log.LogReaderService,
> \
> osgi.service;effective:=active;objectClass=org.osgi.service.log.LogService, \
>
> osgi.service;effective:=active;objectClass=org.osgi.service.packageadmin.PackageAdmin,
> \
>
> osgi.service;effective:=active;objectClass=org.osgi.service.permissionadmin.PermissionAdmin,
> \
>
> osgi.service;effective:=active;objectClass=org.osgi.service.resolver.Resolver,
> \
>
> osgi.service;effective:=active;objectClass=org.osgi.service.startlevel.StartLevel
> {noformat}
> The currently configuration also contains:
> {noformat}
> osgi.service;effective:=active;objectClass=org.osgi.service.url.URLHandlers
> {noformat}
> but this service is not listed by service:list.
> Is it still valid?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
