[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-6270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16832992#comment-16832992
 ] 

Jean-Baptiste Onofré commented on KARAF-6270:
---------------------------------------------

Fair enough, {{ClientConfig}} should deal with illegal values.

> client could be more verbose on config error
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KARAF-6270
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-6270
>             Project: Karaf
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.2.5
>            Reporter: Bernd Eckenfels
>            Assignee: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 4.3.0, 4.2.6
>
>
> When I have a "sshPort=" (empty) property then client.bat/sh will not use the 
> default port. Whats worse is, that the resulting error (even when -p is 
> specified) does not tell me what config file and what option is the problem:
>     Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input 
> string: ""
>             at 
> java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.java:65)
>             at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Integer.java:592)
>             at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Integer.java:615)
>             at 
> org.apache.karaf.client.ClientConfig.getInt(ClientConfig.java:238)
>             at 
> org.apache.karaf.client.ClientConfig.<init>(ClientConfig.java:60)
>             at org.apache.karaf.client.Main.main(Main.java:76)
> I am willing to provide a patch which adds the property name to this 
> exception. However I think for trimmed empty properties it should fall back 
> to the default as well.
> Question: what about invalid (non-numeric) content? Should it also fall back 
> to the default (asuming it might be even overwritten on the command line) as 
> well or should we keep the (enhanced) exception?
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to