[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-4874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jean-Baptiste Onofré updated KARAF-4874:
----------------------------------------
    Comment: was deleted

(was: We define the following configuration for the log map:

{code}
    <map name="org.apache.karaf.cellar.log">
        <time-to-live-seconds>0</time-to-live-seconds>
        <max-idle-seconds>0</max-idle-seconds>
        <eviction-policy>LRU</eviction-policy>
        <max-size policy="PER_PARTITION">5000</max-size>
        <eviction-percentage>25</eviction-percentage>
        <backup-count>0</backup-count>
    </map>
{code}

Are you proposing to define backup count to 1 and increase the eviction 
percentage ?

Regarding the ordering, I guess you mean to order the ClusterLogKey (based on 
the timestamp for instance) ?)

> Distributed log service no order of messages, no serialization
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KARAF-4874
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-4874
>             Project: Karaf
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: cellar
>    Affects Versions: cellar-4.0.2
>            Reporter: Branislav Kalas
>            Assignee: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>            Priority: Major
>
> Cluster log writes records to hazelcast map with ClusterLogRecord instances 
> as keys.
> cluster:log-display then just iterates through keyset of this map and outputs 
> records to console.
> Result is log messages with no ordering (no relation to order of putting 
> records to map) which i think is useless.
> When map reaches its max allowed size, there is LRU eviction strategy 
> defined, which is also incorrect (cause if you use cluster:display you use 
> records withoud any order) and record is just deleted, there is no 
> persistence.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to