[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-1534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15438290#comment-15438290
 ] 

Dinesh Bhat edited comment on KUDU-1534 at 8/26/16 2:24 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------

Cool, thanks. also clarifying: when you say 'trunk', you mean top-of-the-tree 
right ? We currently have '0.10.0-SNAPSHOT' in trunk so when you said 0.10.0, 
you probably meant our RC release bits ? I guess there shouldn't be any 
difference between 0.9.1 or 0.10.0 as far as this test is 
concerned(addiotionally 0.9.1 has tserver software version missing too).


was (Author: dineshabbi):
Cool, thanks. also clarifying: when you say 'trunk', you mean top-of-the-tree 
right ? We currently have '0.10.0-SNAPSHOT' in version_defines.h so when you 
said 0.10.0, you probably meant our RC release bits ? 

> expose software version in ListMaster RPC response
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KUDU-1534
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-1534
>             Project: Kudu
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Dan Burkert
>            Assignee: Dinesh Bhat
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: newbie
>         Attachments: cluster-downgrade.log, cluster-upgrade.log
>
>
> KUDU-1490 exposed the software version of tablet servers in the 
> GetTabletServers RPC response, but an equivalent doesn't exist for 
> ListMasters response.  This will become more important as multi-master setups 
> get more common.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to