[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-1563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15647896#comment-15647896
]
Brock Noland edited comment on KUDU-1563 at 11/8/16 4:07 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
[~danburkert] [~wdberkeley] - what are your thoughts? From a high level, this
is similar to the first approach
[here|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-1563?focusedCommentId=15504136&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15504136]
[~mjacobs] -
1. The patch is nearing completion: https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/4491/
2. I don't believe this is an error: "an UPDATE/DELETE and ignore cases where
maybe there's no row found for the PK." It's just "no rows affected" right?
was (Author: brocknoland):
[~danburkert] [~wdberkeley] - what are your thoughts? From a high level, this
is similar to this approach
[here|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-1563?focusedCommentId=15504136&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15504136]
[~mjacobs] -
1. The patch is nearing completion: https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/4491/
2. I don't believe this is an error: "an UPDATE/DELETE and ignore cases where
maybe there's no row found for the PK." It's just "no rows affected" right?
> Add support for INSERT IGNORE
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: KUDU-1563
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-1563
> Project: Kudu
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Dan Burkert
> Assignee: Brock Noland
> Labels: newbie
>
> The Java client currently has an [option to ignore duplicate row key errors|
> https://kudu.apache.org/apidocs/org/kududb/client/AsyncKuduSession.html#setIgnoreAllDuplicateRows-boolean-],
> which is implemented by filtering the errors on the client side. If we are
> going to continue to support this feature (and the consensus seems to be that
> we probably should), we should promote it to a first class operation type
> that is handled on the server side. This would have a modest perf.
> improvement since less errors are returned, and it would allow INSERT IGNORE
> ops to be mixed in the same batch as other INSERT, DELETE, UPSERT, etc. ops.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
