[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-1504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15816812#comment-15816812 ]
Mike Percy commented on KUDU-1504: ---------------------------------- Hmm I suppose you are right -- this could be duped with KUDU-1330. Sorry about that. Regarding KUDU-1721 I think it encompasses the core consensus / API work to allow for forcing an unsafe config change and testing it while this JIRA and KUDU-1330 encompass exposing that functionality as an administrator-facing tool. > Add a tool to force a Raft config change > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: KUDU-1504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-1504 > Project: Kudu > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: consensus, ops-tooling > Affects Versions: 0.9.0 > Reporter: Mike Percy > > It would be useful to implement a tool that allowed for an > administrator-controlled "forced" configuration change. This type of thing is > useful as a "parachute" if, for example, 2 nodes of a 3-node configuration > were permanently offline. An administrator may wish to accept whatever > potential data loss occurred and force the configuration to be composed of a > single node so that it could come back online and then grown back to a larger > configuration size again. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)