[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-2226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ZhangZhen updated KUDU-2226:
----------------------------
    Summary: Tablets with too many DRSs will cause a huge DMS memory overhead  
(was: Frequently updated table does not flush DeltaMemStore in time and will 
occupy a lot of memory)

> Tablets with too many DRSs will cause a huge DMS memory overhead
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KUDU-2226
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-2226
>             Project: Kudu
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 1.3.0
>         Environment: CentOS6.5 Linux 2.6.32-431
> Kudu1.3.0 
> GitCommit 00813f96b9cb
>            Reporter: ZhangZhen
>
> I have a table with 10M rows in total and has been hash partitioned to 16 
> buckets. Each tablet has about 100MB on disk size according to the /tablets 
> Web UI. Everyday 50K new rows will be inserted into this table, and about 5M 
> rows of this table will be updated, that's about half of rows in total, each 
> row will be updated only once. 
> Then I found something strange, from the /mem-trackers UI of TS, I found 
> every tablet of this table occupied about 900MB memory, mainly occupied by 
> DeltaMemStore, the peak memory consumption is about 1.8G. 
> I don't understand why the DeltaMemStore will cost so much memory, 900MB DMS 
> vs 100MB on disk size, that seems strange to me. What's more, I found these 
> DMS will be flushed very slowly, so for a long time these memory are 
> occupied, which cause "Soft memory limit exceeded" in the TS, and in result 
> cause "Rejecting consensus request".



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to