[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16856257#comment-16856257
 ] 

ZhangYao commented on KUDU-749:
-------------------------------

Oops:(,I mistakenly reversed the result. The average latency decreases by 
nearly two 
orders of magnitude after change. Here is the correct result.


YCSB workloada with recordcount: 1000000 and operationcount: 10000000
[Before change]:
UPDATE Operations: 5001749
AverageLatency(us): 229.49272324540877
MinLatency(us): 1
MaxLatency(us): 1796095
95thPercentileLatency(us): 7
99thPercentileLatency(us):14

[After change]:
UPDATE Operations: 5001052
AverageLatency(us): 3.790199142100502
MinLatency(us): 1
MaxLatency(us): 88703
95thPercentileLatency(us): 7
99thPercentileLatency(us):12

> Improve performance for zipfian update
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KUDU-749
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-749
>             Project: Kudu
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: perf, tablet
>    Affects Versions: Private Beta
>            Reporter: Todd Lipcon
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: screenshot-1.png, screenshot-2.png
>
>
> A zipfian 50/50 update/read workload on YCSB gets slower and slower until 
> it's pretty intolerable (random reads taking 100+ms of CPU). It seems like 
> all the CPU is spent in DMSIterator::PrepareBatch. We're probably doing 
> something dumb here - let's look for some low hanging fruit to fix this.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to