[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-1440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15274652#comment-15274652
]
Jean-Daniel Cryans commented on KUDU-1440:
------------------------------------------
We were trying to put as many warning signs as possible around it so that only
"experts" use it. The patch is now pushed with the method now package-private.
You might see a public version of it in the future, but in the mean time we
want to discourage people to rely on it.
May I invite you to chat more about your use case on the dev list or in the
Slack room? See the links in this page: http://getkudu.io/community.html
I will resolve this Jira as "Later" if that's ok with you.
> Wrong result ordering for scanning a table with millions of rows
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KUDU-1440
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-1440
> Project: Kudu
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: client, master, tablet
> Affects Versions: 0.8.0
> Environment: CentOS 7
> Reporter: Martin Weindel
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: CreateTableTimeSeriesBug.java
>
>
> I have following simple table with two columns:
> {code}
> time TIMESTAMP,
> value FLOAT
> {code}
> The time column is used as range partition key.
> If I have understand the architecture of Kudu correctly, the rows should then
> be returned in ascending order for the time column.
> This works as long as not more than about 600000 rows are inserted.
> If the number of inserted rows is above 1 mio, the order is messed up
> globally. On a microlevel it is still correct 99.9% if you look on successive
> rows.
> My setup is single master / single tablet server on a linux server. The table
> is created, filled and read with the Kudu Java client version 0.8.0.
> See attached Java code to reproduce the problem.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
