GitHub user mapleFU edited a comment on the discussion: Talk about Metadata for 
BloomFilter

Yes. You're right. Solution 2 means we can deduce the size of bloom filter 
since it scale would be `size -> size * scale -> size * scale^2...`. And the 
false-positive rate is unified for all BloomFilters.

I prefer solution 2 too here

GitHub link: 
https://github.com/apache/kvrocks/discussions/1701#discussioncomment-6821590

----
This is an automatically sent email for [email protected].
To unsubscribe, please send an email to: [email protected]

Reply via email to