LindaSummer commented on issue #2671: URL: https://github.com/apache/kvrocks/issues/2671#issuecomment-2526847959
> > Hi @sryanyuan , > > > > > > Sorry to bother you in this thread. > > > > > > I'm trying to create a case from your description for integration test. > > > > > > > If the master is lost, the replication thread will block until the keepalive timer is reached when receiving full-sync SST files. At the same time, if we execute a 'clusterx setnodes' command, it will hold an exclusive lock until the replication thread is stopped. This will cause all other worker threads to block. > > > > > > But I'm not sure about the configuration of the master and slave. > > > > > > Could you give me some advice on reproducing the problem? 😊 > > > > > > Best Regards, Edward > > > > * Write some data into master > > * Add a slave > > * Before the full sync is completed, execute the following commands on the master to simulate network problems: > > ``` > > service network stop > > echo `date "+%y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S"`---service network stop > > sleep 120s > > service network start > > echo `date "+%y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S"`---service network start > > ``` Hi @sryanyuan , Thanks very much! Got it! I will try it later today.😊 Best Regards, Edward -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
