yezhizi commented on issue #3217: URL: https://github.com/apache/kvrocks/issues/3217#issuecomment-3540283274
> does the above answer makes senseif we filter timestamps `[24,30,35]` with `FILTER_BY_TS` option? I just want to make sure that I understood TWA with FILTER_BY_TS before I code it. Hi @var-nan ! I think this is reasonable. Maybe we can treat the samples after FILTER_BY_TS/FILTER_BY_VALUE as the 'complete series', and no longer consider out-of-boundary samples (like the `prev` and `next` you mentioned earlier). This makes sense and is easy to implement, even if it may not completely align with the results of redistimeseies. Since it is difficult for us to use redistimeseies to calibrate our results(for the reasons mentioned above), we can just move forward and refine the details in the future. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
