curious wrote:
>
> if the architect OWNS that building.. yes he has the right to blow it up..
>
Perhaps. But the argument was that the program in question was work-for-hire.
Which means the hirer owned it - not Microsoft. And thus, the hirer was the
one with the right to 'blow it up'.
Jenn V.
--
Humans are the only species to feed and house entirely separate species
for no reason other than the pleasure of their company. Why?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jenn Vesperman http://www.simegen.com/~jenn/
************
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
- Re: micros~1 and apple (was Re: [issues] MS/DOJ ruling) J B
- Re: micros~1 and apple (was Re: [issues] MS/DOJ rulin... Jamie Walker
- Re: micros~1 and apple (was Re: [issues] MS/DOJ rulin... Deirdre Saoirse
- Re: micros~1 and apple (was Re: [issues] MS/DOJ rulin... Emily Ratliff
- Re: micros~1 and apple (was Re: [issues] MS/DOJ rulin... Caitlyn Martin
- Re: micros~1 and apple (was Re: [issues] MS/DOJ rulin... J B
- Re: micros~1 and apple (was Re: [issues] MS/DOJ r... Caitlyn Martin
- Re: micros~1 and apple (was Re: [issues] MS/DOJ r... Jamie Walker
- Re: micros~1 and apple (was Re: [issues] MS/DOJ rulin... J B
- Re: micros~1 and apple (was Re: [issues] MS/DOJ rulin... J B
