Re: [issues] Jamie Lokier (was Re: 50 people to watch)

[jenn]

Kelly Lynn Martin wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 03 Dec 1999 01:01:28 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> 
> >Except that someone mentioned that it's an interpreted language. I
> >would recommend that project management software should not require
> >someone to have the interpreter as well as the software itself -
> >unless Python has some solution for that, too?
> 
> The Python runtime isn't all that large.

(smiles) Irrelevent-to-me. Relevent to other people, but not an argument
that makes a difference to /me/.

As someone else said - if it's not installed already, why should an end 
user have to install something /in addition/ to your software?

But - it looks likely that the project management software will be written
using the 'prototyping' design method. That method drives me up the wall 
and round the bend, so I'm likely to bow out gracefully (rather than yelling
at people till you all get sick of me).




Jenn V.
-- 
  Humans are the only species to feed and house entirely separate species 
     for no reason other than the pleasure of their company. Why?

[EMAIL PROTECTED]        Jenn Vesperman        http://www.simegen.com/~jenn/

************
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.linuxchix.org