[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LIVY-981?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17749319#comment-17749319
 ] 

PJ Fanning commented on LIVY-981:
---------------------------------

Looks like this jar does not even get added to the bin zip. So this entry 
should be removed from the THIRD-PARTY file.

> licensing of ldapsdk
> --------------------
>
>                 Key: LIVY-981
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LIVY-981
>             Project: Livy
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Build
>            Reporter: PJ Fanning
>            Priority: Major
>
> The 0.8.0-incubating binaries at 
> [https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/livy/0.8.0-incubating-rc1/] 
> include a THIRD-PARTY file that lists ldapsdk as having an unknown license.
> [https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/livy/0.8.0-incubating-rc1/]
> We should find out what the license is.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-160 seems to relate to this 
> dependency.
> This appears to be its GItHub page - [https://github.com/pingidentity/ldapsdk]
> This appears to be the license for 4.x release.
> [https://github.com/pingidentity/ldapsdk/blob/4.0.0/LICENSE-UnboundID-LDAPSDK.txt]
> Since release 5.0, ldapsdk can be licensed as ASL. If you upgrade to v5.0, 
> then we should explicitly state that we use ldapsdk under ASL license.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to