[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LIVY-432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Gyorgy Gal updated LIVY-432:
----------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 0.10.0
                       (was: 0.9.0)

This issue has been moved to the 0.10.0 release as part of a bulk update. If 
you feel this is moved out inappropriately, feel free to provide justification 
and reset the Fix Version to 0.9.0.

> Does it necessary to change session id from AtomicInteger to UUID
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LIVY-432
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LIVY-432
>             Project: Livy
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Server
>    Affects Versions: 0.4.0
>            Reporter: sungo fan
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 0.10.0
>
>
> Session ID is created by new AtomicInteger(0).getAndIncrement().  It may be 
> overflow in a system with larger number of users and tasks.  Does it 
> necessary to change session id from AtomicInteger to UUID?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to