[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16967703#comment-16967703 ]
Mikhail Khludnev commented on SOLR-13892: ----------------------------------------- # the attached code doesn't get gain in comparison to existing {{{!join .. score=none}}} SOLR-6234 please prove the opposite # post-filter is irrelevant to these joins (I can explain why). The opportunity for something like post-filtering/two-phase is discussed at LUCENE-6332 > Add postfilter support to {!join} queries > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-13892 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13892 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) > Components: query parsers > Affects Versions: master (9.0) > Reporter: Jason Gerlowski > Priority: Major > Attachments: SOLR-13892.patch > > > The JoinQParserPlugin would be a lot performant in many use-cases if it could > operate as a post-filter, especially when doc-values for the involved fields > are available. > With this issue, I'd like to propose a post-filter implementation for the > {{join}} qparser. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org