[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17033125#comment-17033125
 ] 

David Smiley commented on LUCENE-9211:
--------------------------------------

This seems cool for some use-cases but I worry about the overhead for others.  
I think I have a benchmark module ".alg" file for SerializedDVStrategy in 
spatial-extras.  I should try it out on your PR.

I wish it was easier for us to let users toggle the choice of DocValuesFormat 
only for one type but not for others.  DocValuesFormat is really a format of 
formats, which is inflexible.  [~juan.duran], a colleague of mine, has been 
diving into this topic lately and I hope he shares it here (new issue of 
course).

> Adding compression to BinaryDocValues storage
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-9211
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9211
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core/codecs
>            Reporter: Mark Harwood
>            Assignee: Mark Harwood
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> While SortedSetDocValues can be used today to store identical values in a 
> compact form this is not effective for data with many unique values.
> The proposal is that BinaryDocValues should be stored in LZ4 compressed 
> blocks which can dramatically reduce disk storage costs in many cases. The 
> proposal is blocks of a number of documents are stored as a single compressed 
> blob along with metadata that records offsets where the original document 
> values can be found in the uncompressed content.
> There's a trade-off here between efficient compression (more docs-per-block = 
> better compression) and fast retrieval times (fewer docs-per-block = faster 
> read access for single values). A fixed block size of 32 docs seems like it 
> would be a reasonable compromise for most scenarios.
> A PR is up for review here [https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1234]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to