[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17056226#comment-17056226
 ] 

Anshum Gupta commented on SOLR-14265:
-------------------------------------

Great idea, Cassandra! I was kind of doing that in addition to working through 
and understanding how the new API is structured. There are more than one ways 
the v2 stuff is written so trying to converge on the best option there too.

Having a list of all the endpoints that we want to support with v2 would be 
great, and then I plan on moving those APIs over one after the other.

 

If you already have a document or writeup on that mapping/accounting, please 
feel free to share and that would be a great anchor for this.

> Move to admin API to v2 completely 
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-14265
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14265
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>            Reporter: Anshum Gupta
>            Assignee: Anshum Gupta
>            Priority: Major
>
> V2 admin API has been available in Solr for a very long time, making it 
> difficult for both users and developers to remember and understand which 
> format to use when. We should move to v2 API completely for all Solr Admin 
> calls for the following reasons:
>  # converge code - there are multiple ways of doing the same thing, there's 
> unwanted back-compat code, and we should get rid of that
>  # POJO all the way - no more NamedList. I know this would have split 
> opinions, but I strongly think we should move in this direction. I created 
> Jira about this specific task in the past and went half way but I think we 
> should just close this one out now.
>  # Automatic documentation
>  # Others
> This is just an umbrella Jira for the task. Let's create sub-tasks and split 
> this up as it would require a bunch of rewriting of the code and it makes a 
> lot of sense to get this out with 9.0 so we don't have to support v1 forever! 
> There have been some conversations going on about this and it feels like most 
> folks are happy to go this route.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to