[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17192572#comment-17192572
]
Thomas DuBuisson commented on SOLR-14819:
-----------------------------------------
In response to Bruno's comment I started a conversation on the ML "Code
Analysis during CI". The two responses were positive (from Tomás Fernández
Löbbe and David Smiley). Not sure where this leaves the idea, but the process
is thus:
# Have an organization owner install the app for this repository.
# Commit a `.muse/config.toml` with `jdk11 = true` (ex
[https://github.com/TomMD/lucene-solr/blob/master/.muse.toml)]
But I get that two people in a community with which I'm unfamiliar might not be
decisive - I'm happy to carry on the conversation as people show up.
> SOLR has linear log operations that could trivially be linear
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-14819
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14819
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Thomas DuBuisson
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 8.7
>
> Time Spent: 1h 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The SOLR code has a few linear log operations that could be linear. That is,
> operations of
>
> ```
> for(key in hashmap) doThing(hashmap.get(key));
>
> ```
>
> vs just `for(value in hashmap) doThing(value)`
>
> I have a PR incoming on GitHub to fix a couple of these issue as [found by
> Infer on
> Muse|https://console.muse.dev/result/TomMD/lucene-solr/01EH5WXS6C1RH1NFYHP6ATXTZ9?search=JsonSchemaValidator&tab=results].
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
