[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-9508.
-------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 8.8
                   master (9.0)
    Lucene Fields: New,Patch Available  (was: New)
       Resolution: Fixed

> DocumentsWriter doesn't check for BlockedFlushes in stall mode``
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-9508
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9508
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core/index
>    Affects Versions: 8.5.1
>            Reporter: Sorabh Hamirwasia
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: IndexWriter
>             Fix For: master (9.0), 8.8
>
>          Time Spent: 1h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Hi,
> I was investigating an issue where the memory usage by a single Lucene 
> IndexWriter went up to ~23GB. Lucene has a concept of stalling in case the 
> memory used by each index breaches the 2 X ramBuffer limit (10% of JVM heap, 
> this case ~3GB). So ideally memory usage should not go above that limit. I 
> looked into the heap dump and found that the fullFlush thread when enters 
> *markForFullFlush* method, it tries to take lock on the ThreadStates of all 
> the DWPT thread sequentially. If lock on one of the ThreadState is blocked 
> then it will block indefinitely. This is what happened in my case, where one 
> of the DWPT thread was stuck in indexing process. Due to this fullFlush 
> thread was unable to populate the flush queue even though the stall mode was 
> detected. This caused the new indexing request which came on indexing thread 
> to continue after sleeping for a second, and continue with indexing. In 
> **preUpdate()** method it looks for the stalled case and see if there is any 
> pending flushes (based on flush queue), if not then sleep and continue. 
> Question: 
> 1) Should **preUpdate** look into the blocked flushes information as well 
> instead of just flush queue ?
> 2) Should the fullFlush thread wait indefinitely for the lock on ThreadStates 
> ? Since single blocking writing thread can block the full flush here.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to