[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17365601#comment-17365601
 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-9098:
--------------------------------------------

Hmm while backporting the fix for LUCENE-9981, I noticed that at least some 
parts of this change were not backported, e.g. 
{{TestFuzzyQuery.testErrorMessage}} – I'll backport this one test during my 
backporting efforts, but [~mdrob] maybe you could double check that the rest of 
this fix was indeed backported?  Did we miss anything else maybe?

> Report problematic term value when fuzzy query is too complex
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-9098
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9098
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core/search
>            Reporter: Mike Drob
>            Assignee: Mike Drob
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: main (9.0), 8.5
>
>          Time Spent: 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> This is the lucene compliment to SOLR-13190, when fuzzy query gets a term 
> that expands to too many states, we throw an exception but don't provide 
> insight on the problematic term. We should improve the error reporting.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to