[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mayya Sharipova closed LUCENE-9932.
-----------------------------------
Closing after the 8.9.0 release
> Performance improvement for BKD index building
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-9932
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9932
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core/index
> Affects Versions: 8.8.2
> Reporter: neoremind
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 8.9
>
> Attachments: benchmark_data.png, flame-graph.png,
> refined-code-benchmark.png, refined-code-benchmark2.png
>
> Time Spent: 12.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In BKD index building, the input bytes must be sorted before calling BKD
> writer related API. The sorting method leverages MSB Radix Sort algorithm,
> and the comparing method takes both the bytes itself and the DocId, but in
> real cases, DocIds are usually monotonically increasing. This could yield one
> possible performance enhancer. I found this enhancement when I dig into one
> performance issue in our system. Then I research on the possible solution.
> DocId is usually increased by one when building index in a thread-safe way,
> by assuming such condition, the comparing method can eliminate the
> unnecessary comparing input - DocId, only leave the bytes itself to compare.
> In order to do so, MSB radix sorting and its fallback sorting method must be
> *stable*, so that when elements are the same, the sorting method maintains
> its original order when added, which makes DocId still monotonically
> increasing. To make MSB Radix Sort stable, it needs a trivial update; to make
> fallback sort table, use merge sort instead of quick sort. Meanwhile, there
> should introduce a switch which is able to turn the stable option on or off.
> To validate how much performance could be gained. I make a benchmark taking
> down only the time elapsed in _MutablePointsReaderUtils.sort_ stage.
> *Test environment:*
> MacBook Pro (Retina, 15-inch, Mid 2015), 2.2 GHz Intel Core i7, 16 GB 1600
> MHz DDR3
> *Java version:*
> java version "1.8.0_161"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_161-b12)
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.161-b12, mixed mode)
> *Testcase:*
> bytesPerDim = [1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 16, 32]
> dim = 1
> doc num = 2,000,000
> warm up 5 time, run 10 times to calculate average time used.
> *Result:*
>
> ||bytesPerDim\scenario||disable sort doc id (PR branch)||enable sort doc id
> (master branch)||
> |1|30989.594 us|1151149.9 us|
> |2|313469.47 us|1115595.1 us|
> |3|844617.8 us|1465465.1 us|
> |4|1350946.8 us|1465465.1 us|
> |8|1344814.6 us|1458115.5 us|
> |16|1344516.6 us|1459849.6 us|
> |32|1386847.8 us|1583097.5 us|
> !benchmark_data.png|width=580,height=283!
> Result shows that, by disabling sort DocId, sorting runs 1.73x to 37x faster
> when there are many duplicate bytes (bytesPerDim = 1 or 2 or 3). When data
> cardinality is high (bytesPerDim >= 4, test cases will generate random bytes
> which are more scatter, not likely to be duplicate), the performance does not
> go backward, still a little better.
> In conclusion, in the end to end process for building BKD index, which relies
> on BKDWriter for some data types, performance could be better by ignoring
> DocId if they are already monotonically increasing.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
