[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17383271#comment-17383271
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-10016:
---------------------------------------
+1 I believe that we need to have a no-param method anyway for users who are
getting started who would have no idea what a good value of fanout or ef would
be. We can discuss adding expert methods that expose the accuracy/speed
trade-off later if needed.
Is someone looking into the other suggestion of this issue, which consists of
adding a {{Bits liveDocs}} parameter to the search method in order to make it
possible to ignore deleted documents?
> VectorReader.search needs rethought, o.a.l.search integration?
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-10016
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10016
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 9.0
>
> Time Spent: 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> There's no search integration (e.g. queries) for the current vector values,
> no documentation/examples that I can find.
> Instead the codec has this method:
> {code}
> TopDocs search(String field, float[] target, int k, int fanout)
> {code}
> First, the "fanout" parameter needs to go, this is specific to HNSW impl, get
> it out of here.
> Second, How am I supposed to skip over deleted documents? How can I use
> filters? How should i search across multiple segments?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
