[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17396981#comment-17396981
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-10048:
--------------------------------------
It has been brought up before, I don't think we should allow bypassing the
check. If you use custom term frequencies (expert feature), then it is your
responsibility to have reasonable values.
Otherwise, things can easily overflow, break scoring, cause failures from
checkindex. There are aggregate statistics that assume values are in-bound for
a field in the doc (e.g. less than int32).
> Bypass total frequency check if field uses custom term frequency
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-10048
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10048
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Tony Xu
> Priority: Minor
>
> For all fields whose index option is not *IndexOptions.NONE*. There is a
> check on per field total token count (i.e. field-length) to ensure we don't
> index too many tokens. This is done by accumulating the token's
> *TermFrequencyAttribute.*
>
> Given that currently Lucene allows custom term frequency attached to each
> token and the usage of the frequency can be pretty wild. It is possible to
> have the following case where the check fails with only a few tokens that
> have large frequencies. Currently Lucene will skip indexing the whole
> document.
> *"foo|<very large number> bar|<very large number>"*
>
> What should be way to inform the indexing chain not to check the field length?
> A related observation, when custom term frequency is in use, user is not
> likely to use the similarity for this field. Maybe we can offer a way to
> specify that, too?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
