[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17403974#comment-17403974
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-10067:
--------------------------------------
here is the commits/diff between the two benchmark runs:
https://github.com/apache/lucene/compare/636d10be64ba78230e9ba2b398b7a9d0cf098e44...db26215f156d956143e29f1ce43f90c30cd8a107
(I opened a luceneutil bug to fix this to point at apache/lucene instead of
apache/lucene-solr, that is why point-n-click doesnt work)
> investigate 6/23/2001 -> 6/24/2001 drop in facets perf
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-10067
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10067
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Priority: Major
>
> Just looking at perf graph (and recent gains from LUCENE-5309), it is unclear
> why performance dropped on that date, and if we paved new, better
> performance, or instead just regained some lost-ground only in the single
> value case?
> Example:
> https://home.apache.org/~mikemccand/lucenebench/BrowseDayOfYearSSDVFacets.html
> after some debugging, it looks like LUCENE-9613 change may be responsible. It
> was the only relevant change between the 6/23 and 6/24 benchmarks.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
