[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17428846#comment-17428846
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-10170:
--------------------------------------
[~jpountz] maybe we should open an issue to add a simple stored fields
benchmark to this thing.
The last time I worked on a stored fields issue, I had to write my own because
i wanted to avoid hassle and noise:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13022737/Indexer.java
> Regression in stored fields compression in 9.0
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-10170
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10170
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: main (9.0)
>
> Time Spent: 40m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> One of the Elasticsearch benchmarks detected a regression that is attributed
> to stored fields compression after moving to a 9.0 snapshot. I managed to
> isolate it to the change done on LUCENE-7521. It looks like LZ4 relied
> significantly on Direct16 for good performance, so replacing it with Packed64
> degraded compression speed.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
