[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17437365#comment-17437365
]
Greg Miller commented on LUCENE-10120:
--------------------------------------
So I don't think there's any need to "create and discard" fixed bit sets here,
but maybe I'm overlooking something. I've attached a quick patch file to show
what I was thinking. This appears to pass all unit tests, but I haven't spent
much time with it so it's very possible there's a bug in there. I also didn't
run any benchmarks. Just wanted to share what I had in my head.
> Lazy initialize FixedBitSet in LRUQueryCache
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-10120
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10120
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core/search
> Affects Versions: main (10.0)
> Reporter: Lu Xugang
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: 1.png, LUCENE-10120.patch
>
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Basing on the implement of collecting docIds in DocsWithFieldSet, may be we
> could do similar way to cache docIdSet in
> *LRUQueryCache#cacheIntoBitSet(BulkScorer scorer, int maxDoc)* when docIdSet
> is density.
> In this way , we do not always init a huge FixedBitSet which sometime is not
> necessary when maxDoc is large
>
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
