gsmiller commented on a change in pull request #606:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/606#discussion_r785150523



##########
File path: 
lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/taxonomy/FastTaxonomyFacetCounts.java
##########
@@ -126,23 +126,39 @@ private void countAll(IndexReader reader) throws 
IOException {
 
       NumericDocValues singleValued = DocValues.unwrapSingleton(multiValued);
       if (singleValued != null) {
-        for (int doc = singleValued.nextDoc();
-            doc != DocIdSetIterator.NO_MORE_DOCS;
-            doc = singleValued.nextDoc()) {
-          if (liveDocs != null && liveDocs.get(doc) == false) {
-            continue;
+        if (liveDocs != null) {
+          for (int doc = singleValued.nextDoc();
+              doc != DocIdSetIterator.NO_MORE_DOCS;
+              doc = singleValued.nextDoc()) {
+            if (liveDocs.get(doc)) {
+              values[(int) singleValued.longValue()]++;
+            }
+          }
+        } else {

Review comment:
       Hmm, breaking out separate methods sent qps tanking in my local 
benchmarks. Any thoughts @rmuir? Maybe I missed the mark on what you were 
suggesting (entirely possible)? Here's the change: 
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/606/commits/d084f857f568d650e64d5c40dd9b411d3ce11e85
   
   ```
                               TaskQPS baseline      StdDevQPS candidate      
StdDev                Pct diff p-value
              BrowseMonthTaxoFacets       27.87     (23.7%)       11.73      
(1.3%)  -57.9% ( -67% -  -43%) 0.000
               BrowseDateTaxoFacets       21.90     (20.9%)       11.77      
(7.9%)  -46.2% ( -62% -  -21%) 0.000
          BrowseDayOfYearTaxoFacets       21.88     (21.1%)       11.83      
(8.1%)  -45.9% ( -62% -  -21%) 0.000
        BrowseRandomLabelTaxoFacets       18.22     (17.8%)        9.96      
(6.8%)  -45.3% ( -59% -  -25%) 0.000
   ```




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to