[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17495333#comment-17495333
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10424:
----------------------------------------------------------
Commit 36a2149d43fd9cbb0c0059e85bd7a56cce651be7 in lucene's branch
refs/heads/main from Lu Xugang
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene.git;h=36a2149 ]
LUCENE-10424: Optimize the "everything matches" case for count query in
PointRangeQuery (#691)
> Optimize the "everything matches" case for count query in PointRangeQuery
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-10424
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10424
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 9.1
> Reporter: Lu Xugang
> Priority: Minor
> Time Spent: 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In Implement of Weight#count in PointRangeQuery, Whether additional
> consideration is needed that when PointValues#getDocCount() ==
> IndexReader#maxDoc() and the range's lower bound is less that the field's min
> value and the range's upper bound is greater than the field's max value, then
> return reader.maxDoc() directly?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
